This study conducted a comparative analysis of Extracurricular activities within the educational systems of Iran, Finland, and Malaysia, using George Bereday's model. The selection of these countries was based on the idea that “different social systems lead to different educational outcomes.” To gather primary and secondary data, data was sourced from reputable international database, including UNESCO and the Ministries of Education of the selected countries. Face validity was employed to ensure data accuracy, while intra-subject agreement was used to assess reliability. The findings revealed significant similarities among Finland, Malaysia, and Iran in their objectives, comprehensive student development focus, and diversity of activities offered. However, notable differences were observed regarding the defined roles and training for teachers, the voluntary nature of participation in activities, and the involvement of other organizations and clubs. Malaysia and Finland prioritize educational equity and provide a wide range of free in-school programs. In contrast, various sports, clubs, and artistic programs in those nations are typically available at specific times or in specialized centers outside of school hours. On the other hand, Iran mainly implements its programs during school hours and places less emphasis on program evaluation compared to Malaysia and Finland, where rigorous evaluations are standard practice. Based on these findings, it is recommended that education policymakers focus on enhancing the role of coaches, increasing the flexibility and diversity of programs, providing support for program implementation, and strengthening oversight in the evaluation of Extracurricular activities.